With the projected loss of over 5 million barrels of oil a day due to sanctions against Russia, as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the world faces an artificial energy crisis. This crisis will throw the world’s economy into turmoil, and possibly throw the world into a prolonged economic slump.
With the United States now relaxing sanctions against Venezuela in order to increase oil flow into the world energy market, and going hat in hand to the right wing Saudi Arabian government, the past policies of the United States are in a state of disarray. By appealing to right wing governments in Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, the Biden Administration is allowing these governments to benefit from the Russia-Ukraine War, and punishing the American people by refusing to develop the ample supplies of shale oil that is in the United States.
What is glaringly absent from the Biden Administration’s energy policies is ignoring, and refusing to allow oil companies to develop the massive oil shale deposits in the Green River Formation. The Green River Formation contains up to 4.3 trillion barrels of shale oil, which could be easily developed, and at a cost far below the average cost of developing either the current shale oil fields or the normal method of extracting oil from other traditional oil fields.
With the Biden Administration freezing oil drilling on federal land, the energy policy by the Biden Administration is quite literally insane.
The Green River Formation is located at the Green River in western Colorado, eastern Utah, and southwestern Wyoming.
The energy resources of the Green River Formation are not a true oil, but a form of pre-oil called kerogen. Kerogen is insoluble in water and in other organic solvents such as benzene or alcohol. However, when the kerogen is heated under pressure it breaks down into recoverable gaseous and liquid substances resembling petroleum. It is possible to break down this substance into synthetic oil.
Unlike normal processes of extracting shale oil called fracking, a process called pyrolysis is used. Pyrolysis occurs in the absence or near absence of oxygen. The rate of pyrolysis increases with temperature. “Pyrolysis transforms organic materials into their gaseous components, a solid residue of carbon and ash, and a liquid called pyrolytic oil (or bio-oil). Pyrolysis has two primary methods for removing contaminants from a substance: destruction and removal.”
Hydraulic fracturing is used to recover oil and natural gas in oil shale deposits, where traditional oil drilling methods are not capable of recovering the oil in the rock strata. Hydraulic fracturing is also known as “fracking.” In order to recover the oil using fracking, a well is drilled into the rock strata containing the recoverable oil and natural gas. Then water, sand, and chemicals are injected into the well under high water pressure to continue to fracture the rock strata.
This then forces the oil and natural gas out of the well and is recovered into holding containers for further processing.
A huge amount of water is used during the fracking process. This is called the water cost. In a normal fracking procedure, between 1.5 to 9.7 million gallons of water are used to complete the fracking process for just one well. The water used during fracking becomes too polluted to be able to be used for human consumption. While the water used in fracking can be treated to return it to a potable status, the cost of doing so is so high, that typically the contaminated water is pumped into an underground chamber and removed from the rainwater cycle.
The technology to develop the Green River Formation does not use typical fracturing methods, so the water cost for the extraction is minimal. Because of the dramatically lower water cost, the breakeven point for extracting the kerogen is much less than traditional fracking.
The Green River Formation is a national security issue
The economic and political consequences of Russia invading Ukraine are now becoming clear.
One of the more obvious consequences has been the rapid rise in the price of oil. As of June 13, the spot price of oil was $121.60 a barrel. Despite pleas from the Biden administration to Saudi Arabia to increase oil production, the Saudis have refused to do so. The United Arab Emirates appears to be siding with the Saudis and have also declined to raise oil production.
The Saudis are unhappy with the Biden administration’s efforts to renegotiate the Iran nuclear deal. They are also convinced that they have more in common with Russia in the current international environment. The Saudis are also angered by the pullback of support by the United States for its war in Yemen. This would appear to be the death knell of the agreement between the United States and Saudi Arabia where the U.S. guaranteed the national security of Saudi Arabia, while the Saudis guaranteed a steady supply of oil.
With the world upended because of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the need for Europe to have steady oil and natural gas supplies, it is essential that the United States tap its vast oil shale reserves in the Green River Formation. This would help stabilize the energy security of the United States and its European allies. It would also make the United States 100% energy secure and free the United States from the cauldron of Middle East politics.
It should be noted here that this type of action by the United States would not be adding to the use of fossil fuels in the world. The exploitation of the Green River Formation would simply be displacing the use of fossil fuels from other sources of oil.
The cost of extracting this energy source cannot be accurately estimated. However, since the current technology available consumes less water because of the volatilization of water effect, the water cost is minimal, and so the breakeven cost of extracting a barrel of oil is significantly less than conventional fracking methods.
Reuters has estimated that the breakeven point for shale oil produced by fracking is $50. As noted above, fracking has a high-water cost. Since the current technology has a much lower water cost, it can be safely estimated to have a breakeven point of between $25 to $35 per barrel. If economies of scale are used, the cost could fall to as low as $15 to $25 a barrel.
Looking beyond the Energy Price Shock to China’s Low Carbon Transition
I am a retired economist, and a retired soldier. I have a degree in Economics and a degree in Liberal Arts. While in the military my specialty was in Intelligence and Administration.
Alliance of Democracies Could Transform United Kingdom
The Illusion of Constraint: Russia Advances in Eastern Ukraine Despite Harsh Sanctions
Is U.S. Influence Waning in Latin America?
Putin: They believe that Western Dominance in global politics is eternal- Nothing is Eternal
Have Europeans been profoundly deceived?
The Evolutionary Processes for New Models to End the Dominance of the United States
Authors: Martin Raiser, Sebastian Eckardt
The conflict in Ukraine has caused a massive shock to the global economy. Crude oil prices in early March spiked to as high as $140 per barrel, levels that were last seen in 2008. While prices have since come down from these peaks, they remain elevated, fueling already high inflation and hurting consumers and economic growth worldwide. Faced with this shock, countries everywhere are reappraising priorities, putting resilience at front and center. A renewed emphasis on food and energy security has compelled governments to reintroduce fossil fuel subsidies and ramp up domestic oil, gas and coal production, seemingly placing efforts to curb climate change on the back burner.
These reactions are understandable. A tactical retreat in the short run may be the price to pay to maintain public support for the long-term goal. But the economic case for accelerated climate action remains as strong as ever. For a country such as China with the domestic policy space to act, there are three key reasons to stay the course on the low carbon transition and aim for an early peak in emissions.
First, accelerating the energy transition would strengthen Beijing’s resilience to the volatility of global fossil fuel prices by reducing its dependence on oil & gas imports. Last year alone, China imported fossil fuels – oil, gas, and coal – worth $ 365.7 billion – the equivalent of more than two percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP). This dependence on fuel imports is exposing the economy to global commodity price fluctuations. In contrast, renewable energy is essentially a domestic resource, especially for China, which is a major producer of key renewable energy technologies from wind turbines to battery storage.
Secondly, while higher energy prices may boost the short-term global supply of fossil fuels, in the longer-term outlook, higher and more volatile energy prices will push incentives for energy importers to diversify away from fossil fuels. This will likely catalyze individual and global efforts to decarbonize energy systems, boosting global demand for low carbon technologies and alternative sources of energy. China has the technological capabilities to benefit by anticipating and getting ahead of this all-important global shift.
Additionally, rising energy prices would challenge China’s investment and industry-led growth model, reinforcing the case for accelerated structural changes and rebalancing. High prices will increase pressures on China’s economy to diversify away from traditional investments and heavy industries, including iron, steel and cement production, which account for a disproportionate share of the country’s GDP but face diminishing returns and low productivity growth. The slowdown in the domestic real estate sector is already pointing in this direction. Higher energy prices could galvanize the shift toward an innovation- and services-based economic growth model.
Even as policymakers remain focused on mitigating the economic and social impact of recent sharp changes in relative prices, there are measures they can take today to prepare for the low carbon transition and reduce its costs. For example, rising energy prices will create incentives for more sustainable business models, but only if investors believe they are here to stay. This is why credible long-term guidance on the intended trajectory of carbon pricing and other policies to decarbonize China’s economy is so important. This would help investors anticipate future price increases and help bring clean energy investments forward without any immediate need to regulate or raise the price of carbon. The current period of high energy prices is the moment to provide such forward guidance, as market price incentives are already pointing in the right direction.
Fiscal policy can complement the role of price signals by supporting the necessary economic adjustment rather than trying to slow it down. The prospect of additional government stimulus to boost growth could provide the financing for a wave of green investments, including in the build-out and integration of more renewable energy capacity. In agriculture, rising fertilizer prices should provide incentives to reduce excessive usage. However, this shift would be thwarted if input-based subsidies remain in place. Instead, farmers could be compensated for higher input prices with subsidies that are tied to a shift toward resilient production methods. Field studies reveal that chemical fertilizers can be effectively substituted with animal manure, reducing agricultural greenhouse gas emissions at no cost to yields. To realize such a shift, greater investment in agricultural extension is required.
Finally, rising energy and food prices would hurt the poor and more vulnerable households the most. But rather than providing subsidies across the board, a more robust and targeted social safety net could protect the vulnerable populations in urban and rural areas. Offering such targeted protection could ensure price signals are not diluted but the structural changes necessary for the transition to a greener and more innovative growth model don’t come at the expense of rising poverty and social inequality.
While adding headwinds to the near-term economic outlook, the current energy price shock reinforces the case for accelerating China’s energy transition. Policymakers should keep their eyes on the long-term target and use this opportunity to prepare the ground.
(first published on CGTN via World Bank)
Traditional energy production in advanced economies involves the importation of large amounts of oil and gas from a small number of suppliers. Renewable energy systems under new community ownership structures are being pioneered all over the Europe. The goal is to develop cheap, clean and secure energy by bringing power generation closer to the people who will use it.
Squeezed between the war in Ukraine, the pandemic and climate change, the European energy system is experiencing an unprecedented crisis. Bill payers are coping with sharp increases in energy prices which show no signs of abating. In the second half of 2021, average prices for electricity (and gas) jumped by more than 11% in the EU, compared to the same period in 2020, according to Eurostat electricity price statistics. That was before the geopolitical crisis arising from the invasion of Ukraine by Russia in late February prompted sanctions which further squeeze energy supply.
The European Green Deal strategy which plans to decarbonise energy production in the European Union has been strengthened by the REPowerEU plan to decrease dependency on Russian fossil fuels. This combination will accelerate the green transition. ‘In this respect, the Ukraine crisis can be seen as a catalyst in renewable energy transitions,’ said Nicolien van der Grijp of the NEWCOMERS project.
One answer to the global energy challenge is being devised at the local and regional level through clean-energy communities. These are groups of people that voluntarily pool their resources to produce energy together. The goal of NEWCOMERS is to identify thriving and sustainable business models in newly emerging clean communities. A senior researcher with the department of Environmental Policy Analysis (EPA) at VU Amsterdam, van der Grijp says energy communities ‘contribute to making citizens more aware of energy issues and give them a perspective to take action themselves’.
Heating and cooling alone making up 30% of Europe’s energy use. To satisfy this demand, about 60% of EU energy needs are met with imports and over 66% of the EU’s energy imports in 2020 were petroleum products, followed by gas and coal. Instead of importing fossil fuels from far away, the growth of renewables makes it possible to produce energy closer to the location where it is consumed.
The main renewables produced in energy communities are solar, wind and hydro-power, but other sources such as hydrogen, geothermal and district heating are increasingly being tested and deployed. Members of the energy community usually consume the electricity produced and, depending on local conditions, they may also adopt other activities such as car shares, communal gardens and green roofs.
NEWCOMERS highlights the types of policy environments in which energy communities flourish, how the players are organised, the technologies used and how the business models work. It also analyses the value the energy community creates for members and broader society as well as the effects membership has on energy-related behaviour.
‘Besides helping to tackle the climate crisis, energy communities also provide value in economic and social respects,’ van der Grijp said. ‘They may create local jobs and enhance social cohesion.’ The advantages of this approach go beyond independence from polluting sources, to include a tangible social transformation.
NEWCOMERS’ research results show that awareness levels differ greatly between European countries. According to van der Grijp, this presents challenges around creating supportive policies and laws in EU Member States. It also complicates subsidy schemes that support a good business case, and services dedicated to helping people to set up and operate energy communities.
‘We hope that our findings will contribute to several policy changes that are urgently needed,’ said van der Grijp, who formulated a series of policy recommendations and a policy brief for European policy makers together with similar projects.
Dr Maria Rosaria Di Nucci is coordinating the COME RES project which aims to facilitate the diffusion of renewable energy communities (RECs) in nine EU countries and to support the implementation of a regulatory framework for RECs. In doing so, the project will initiate learning processes and exchange between regions with advanced REC development and regions with expansion potential. Each country has a target and a learning region.
‘Renewable energy communities are important vehicles for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and for providing positive social, environmental and economic impacts,’ said Di Nucci. ‘They also foster regional and rural development.’
‘The vision is the evolution from an energy system based on large centralised power plants to a citizen-led distributed energy production model based on renewable energy sources, which still represents a socio-political and regulatory challenge in most European countries,’ said Di Nucci.
The unique selling point of COME RES and the operative arm of the project are the nine so-called country desks. These can be regarded as informal dialogue fora involving the national project partners, community energy organisations, other key actors and market players from specific target regions and beyond. They organise thematic dialogues and policy roundtables to create solutions to overcome existing barriers for the growth of community energy.
COME RES also provides input to policy through policy labs, action plan proposals, policy recommendations and engagement with stakeholders. Some fundamental changes are needed ‘if the energy transition is to continue to be implemented locally and democratically.’ Di Nucci mentioned simplifying financing, reducing bureaucratic barriers, and reforming the auction model for renewables projects.
Most energy communities adopt the legal form of a cooperative, but they can also take the form of associations or foundations. Some have developed specific approaches to include marginalised groups and people living in energy poverty.
For the energy communities to be successful, civic engagement is key. W4RES is working to scale up the involvement of women in supporting and accelerating market uptake of renewable energy sources. A total of 50-60 renewable heating and cooling projects and initiatives across eight countries is expected to be supported by the end of the project.
The W4RES perspective is that women as agents of change can make a difference in the energy transition,’ said W4RES coordinator, Ioannis Konstas. Energy communities should engage more women in their organisational structures and provide leadership.
‘To be truly transformative, energy access and the energy sector must be linked with an agenda that challenges the stereotypes of women,’ said Konstas, ‘And that also advances their rights, dignity and visibility in their various roles as consumers, producers, investors, experts, and agents of change.’
Although a relatively new innovation, renewable energy communities possess a huge potential. Their development will have a profound impact on the energy transition and the everyday lives of European citizens.
The research in this article was funded by the EU. This article was originally published in Horizon, the EU Research and Innovation Magazine.
A battery to most people is something that goes in a car, or is a cell used in flashlights, toys, video games, controllers, TV remotes, etc. But there is another kind of battery and on a different scale — a reservoir of energy.
As a young engineer, I joined a trip organized by a professional society to a new power station in Wales that also worked on the same principle as a battery. During off-peak hours when electricity demand was low, water was pumped up to a higher reservoir — North Wales is hilly. It was then allowed to flow down during peak electricity demand times (usually 6pm to 10pm) to drive water turbines and generate power.
While ‘pumped hydro’ provides over 90 percent of the world’s high capacity energy storage, it has drawbacks: the vertiginous terrain required together with and an abundance of water for example. Lithium ion storage using lithium salts is also being used and some say is poised to dominate energy storage. And there are new advances to make use safer and cheaper.
Another storage idea being employed is in conjunction with alternative energy sources like solar or wind. Gravitricity is an Edinburgh company that has a small demonstration model. It hoists a 50 tonne iron weight inch by inch before releasing it gradually to generate power.
Their small test system produces enough power to supply about 750 homes. What has been encouraging is the system’s longevity, the life of the lifting cable in particular and how the team were able to control it. Also individual components are designed to be easily replaceable giving the whole a decades-long working life with regular maintenance.
Then there is the obvious attraction of disused mine shafts. Obviating the need for building higher derricks, the weight can be dropped down from a much smaller supporting structure. If North Wales has the craggy hills, South Wales has the abandoned coal mines.
However, there are safety issues in mines with methane gas and the possibility of flooding. For these reasons plus the greater uniformity of purpose-built shafts, Gravitricity is proceeding also with sinking new holes.
At the same time, the attraction of a deep, clean mine shaft is difficult to resist. A full-sized Gravitricity installation with a 300 meter deep mine shaft is expected to be functional by 2024 — most likely in the Czech Republic. Clearly a subterranean endeavor is less of a blot on the landscape.
Energy from a green source, and an installation that stores unused energy for release during peak loads … plus it is mostly underground. All of it satisfies the public mood for an equitable transition into a low-carbon economy. Emissions are reduced and the former mine workers secure alternative jobs. Green energy may still be a minor player but the fact remains it has surpassed coal, and green means of storage can alleviate some of its drawbacks.
Escape from Königsberg, Prussia, January 1945 “My dearest father, …. We were going to go out and, all of a...
Ever since the British voted to leave the European Union in 2015, the country has struggled to articulate a vision...
Is mankind really on the brink of an exciting, but potentially terrifying future? Some scholars think that this is the...
When thinking about regional financial integration, one would think of regional currencies like the Euro as the epitome example, however...
China could be entering choppy Middle Eastern waters. Multiple crises and conflicts will likely shape its relations with the region’s...
The war of attrition is gradually becoming a reality as Russia continues to make gains in the east. According to...
The first Summit of the Americas convened in Miami, Florida (Dec 1994). Imagined by Bill Clinton, it increased trade and...
Africa’s Economy and the New Global Order
US national policy regarding the nuclear threat in the Russo-Ukrainian war
Artificial intelligence and moral issues: The essence of robotics
Why Africa Comes Under Critical Review at St. Petersburg Forum
More Action; Fewer Words: Pakistan’s Military Diplomacy
Morocco Hosts the 14th US-Africa Business Summit
America’s Decline in Life Expectancy Accelerated in 2020